# Palm 2 vs Qwen1.5-110B

> Qwen1.5-110B is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.2 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/palm-2-vs-qwen1-5-110b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Palm 2 scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen1.5-110B in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Qwen1.5-110B leads 33.6 to 20.9.
- Qwen1.5-110B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Palm 2 | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 30.0 | 34.2 |
| Rank | 298 | 234 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Palm 2: 29.0 (#311)
- Qwen1.5-110B: 33.0 (#264)

| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 994 | 1184 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 35% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 44.4% |

## Reasoning

- Palm 2: 19.1 (#271)
- Qwen1.5-110B: 22.7 (#189)

| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | 1168 |
| ForecastBench | — | 57.7 |

## Math

- Palm 2: 30.8 (#231)
- Qwen1.5-110B: 33.7 (#201)

| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1049 | 1185 |

## Knowledge

- Palm 2: —
- Qwen1.5-110B: 31.2 (#219)

| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1144 |

## Multilingual

- Palm 2: 20.9 (#295)
- Qwen1.5-110B: 33.6 (#250)

| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 916 | 1142 |
| LMArena Chinese | 887 | 1206 |
| LMArena French | — | 1151 |
| LMArena German | — | 1123 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1074 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1044 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1118 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1142 |

## Instruction Following

- Palm 2: 51.0 (#296)
- Qwen1.5-110B: 60.3 (#252)

| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1010 | 1158 |

## Long Context

- Palm 2: 30.8 (#285)
- Qwen1.5-110B: 35.1 (#242)

| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1010 | 1157 |

## Writing & Preference

- Palm 2: 25.6 (#304)
- Qwen1.5-110B: 38.0 (#255)

| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1027 | 1175 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 991 | 1148 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 994 | 1160 |

## FAQ

### Is Palm 2 better than Qwen1.5-110B?

Qwen1.5-110B is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.2 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Palm 2 or Qwen1.5-110B better for coding?

Qwen1.5-110B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.0 versus 29.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Palm 2 and Qwen1.5-110B share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Palm 2 has 10 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-110B has 20.