# Palm 2 vs phi-3-medium 14B

> Palm 2 and phi-3-medium 14B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.4 vs 29.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/palm-2-vs-phi-3-medium-14b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in coding, where phi-3-medium 14B leads 36.3 to 28.5.
- phi-3-medium 14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Palm 2 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 29.4 | 29.1 |
| Rank | 296 | 306 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- Palm 2: 28.5 (#306)
- phi-3-medium 14B: 36.3 (#198)

| Benchmark | Palm 2 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 37.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 995 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 48.7% |

## Reasoning

- Palm 2: 18.2 (#270)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Palm 2 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | — |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 55.8% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 81.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 121.18 |
| HellaSwag | — | 82.4% |
| WinoGrande | — | 81.5% |

## Math

- Palm 2: 28.4 (#229)
- phi-3-medium 14B: 25.2 (#249)

| Benchmark | Palm 2 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1049 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 17.6% |

## Knowledge

- Palm 2: —
- phi-3-medium 14B: 9.1 (#301)

| Benchmark | Palm 2 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 27.6% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 91.6% |
| MMLU | — | 78% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 87.4% |
| TriviaQA | — | 73.9% |

## Multilingual

- Palm 2: 21.1 (#290)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Palm 2 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 916 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 887 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Palm 2: 51.3 (#291)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Palm 2 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1010 | — |

## Long Context

- Palm 2: 30.7 (#280)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Palm 2 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1010 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Palm 2: 25.7 (#299)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Palm 2 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1027 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 991 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 994 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Palm 2 better than phi-3-medium 14B?

Palm 2 and phi-3-medium 14B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.4 vs 29.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Palm 2 or phi-3-medium 14B better for coding?

phi-3-medium 14B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.3 versus 28.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Palm 2 and phi-3-medium 14B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Palm 2 has 10 scored results on Noometry and phi-3-medium 14B has 13.