# Olmo 7b Instruct vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

> Olmo 7b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.7 to 28.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/olmo-7b-instruct-vs-qwen2-5-7b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen2.5 7B Instruct leads 48.8 to 26.0.

## Snapshot

| | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 29.7 | 28.6 |
| Rank | 293 | 314 |
| Context | — | 131K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.17 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.70 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Olmo 7b Instruct: 29.1 (#298)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 35.9 (#204)

| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 37.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1016 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 46.1% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Olmo 7b Instruct: —
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 23.5 (#117)

| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | — | 7.8% |

## Reasoning

- Olmo 7b Instruct: 18.0 (#273)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 14.3 (#317)

| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 993 | — |
| DTBench | — | 47.7% |
| LMCA | — | 6.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 118.44 |

## Math

- Olmo 7b Instruct: 27.8 (#234)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 11.8 (#300)

| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 2.5% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 29.4% |
| LMArena Math | 1018 | — |

## Knowledge

- Olmo 7b Instruct: —
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 17.0 (#281)

| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 35.5% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 53.9% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 34.1% |
| MMLU | — | 72.9% |

## Multilingual

- Olmo 7b Instruct: 24.1 (#286)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 977 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1013 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 946 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Olmo 7b Instruct: 49.3 (#296)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 63.4 (#226)

| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | — | 74.1% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 978 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Olmo 7b Instruct: 26.0 (#298)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 48.8 (#194)

| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1032 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 990 | — |
| WildBench | — | 73.1% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1007 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Olmo 7b Instruct better than Qwen2.5 7B Instruct?

Olmo 7b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.7 to 28.6 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Olmo 7b Instruct or Qwen2.5 7B Instruct better for coding?

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.9 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Olmo 7b Instruct and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 7b Instruct has 10 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has 15.