# Olmo 7b Instruct vs Qwen1.5-72B

> Olmo 7b Instruct and Qwen1.5-72B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.7 vs 30.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/olmo-7b-instruct-vs-qwen1-5-72b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Olmo 7b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen1.5-72B in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen1.5-72B leads 37.4 to 26.0.

## Snapshot

| | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 29.7 | 30.3 |
| Rank | 293 | 282 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Olmo 7b Instruct: 29.1 (#298)
- Qwen1.5-72B: 31.4 (#272)

| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1016 | 1166 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 33.2% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 40.3% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 59.1% |
| MBPP+ | — | 61.6% |

## Reasoning

- Olmo 7b Instruct: 18.0 (#273)
- Qwen1.5-72B: 21.2 (#201)

| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 993 | 1148 |

## Math

- Olmo 7b Instruct: 27.8 (#234)
- Qwen1.5-72B: 30.7 (#205)

| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1018 | 1164 |

## Knowledge

- Olmo 7b Instruct: —
- Qwen1.5-72B: 11.5 (#295)

| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 28.8% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1136 |

## Multilingual

- Olmo 7b Instruct: 24.1 (#286)
- Qwen1.5-72B: 33.4 (#248)

| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 977 | 1135 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1013 | 1186 |
| LMArena Russian | 946 | 1104 |
| LMArena French | — | 1158 |
| LMArena German | — | 1084 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1061 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1049 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1110 |

## Instruction Following

- Olmo 7b Instruct: 49.3 (#296)
- Qwen1.5-72B: 59.6 (#251)

| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 978 | 1142 |

## Long Context

- Olmo 7b Instruct: —
- Qwen1.5-72B: 35.0 (#238)

| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1157 |

## Writing & Preference

- Olmo 7b Instruct: 26.0 (#298)
- Qwen1.5-72B: 37.4 (#253)

| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1032 | 1166 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 990 | 1137 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1007 | 1160 |

## FAQ

### Is Olmo 7b Instruct better than Qwen1.5-72B?

Olmo 7b Instruct and Qwen1.5-72B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.7 vs 30.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Olmo 7b Instruct or Qwen1.5-72B better for coding?

Qwen1.5-72B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 31.4 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Olmo 7b Instruct and Qwen1.5-72B share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 7b Instruct has 10 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-72B has 22.