# Olmo 7b Instruct vs Qwen1.5-32B

> Olmo 7b Instruct and Qwen1.5-32B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.3 vs 30.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/olmo-7b-instruct-vs-qwen1-5-32b
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Olmo 7b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen1.5-32B in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in instruction following, where Qwen1.5-32B leads 57.7 to 49.0.

## Snapshot

| | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 30.3 | 30.5 |
| Rank | 295 | 293 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Olmo 7b Instruct: 29.6 (#303)
- Qwen1.5-32B: 31.7 (#282)

| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1016 | 1155 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 32.3% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 42% |

## Reasoning

- Olmo 7b Instruct: 18.8 (#274)
- Qwen1.5-32B: 21.8 (#212)

| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 993 | 1130 |

## Math

- Olmo 7b Instruct: 30.2 (#237)
- Qwen1.5-32B: 33.0 (#207)

| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1018 | 1155 |

## Knowledge

- Olmo 7b Instruct: —
- Qwen1.5-32B: 13.5 (#296)

| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 30.7% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1126 |
| MMLU | — | 74.4% |

## Multilingual

- Olmo 7b Instruct: 24.0 (#291)
- Qwen1.5-32B: 31.4 (#259)

| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 977 | 1106 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1014 | 1177 |
| LMArena Russian | 947 | 1073 |
| LMArena French | — | 1101 |
| LMArena German | — | 1058 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1027 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1008 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1089 |

## Instruction Following

- Olmo 7b Instruct: 49.0 (#301)
- Qwen1.5-32B: 57.7 (#265)

| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 978 | 1116 |

## Long Context

- Olmo 7b Instruct: —
- Qwen1.5-32B: 34.7 (#246)

| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1146 |

## Writing & Preference

- Olmo 7b Instruct: 25.8 (#303)
- Qwen1.5-32B: 34.2 (#271)

| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1032 | 1137 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 990 | 1083 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1007 | 1140 |

## FAQ

### Is Olmo 7b Instruct better than Qwen1.5-32B?

Olmo 7b Instruct and Qwen1.5-32B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.3 vs 30.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Olmo 7b Instruct or Qwen1.5-32B better for coding?

Qwen1.5-32B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 31.7 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Olmo 7b Instruct and Qwen1.5-32B share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 7b Instruct has 10 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-32B has 21.