# Olmo 3 32b Think vs Yi-Lightning

> Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.7 to 37.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/olmo-3-32b-think-vs-yi-lightning
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 14

## Summary

- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Olmo 3 32b Think scores higher in 2 categories and Yi-Lightning in 6 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Olmo 3 32b Think leads 38.6 to 27.4.
- Olmo 3 32b Think has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Olmo 3 32b Think | Yi-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | 01.AI |
| Noometry Index | 38.7 | 37.1 |
| Rank | 183 | 209 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.6 (#172)
- Yi-Lightning: 27.4 (#320)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Yi-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1319 | 1312 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 12.9% |

## Reasoning

- Olmo 3 32b Think: 25.9 (#140)
- Yi-Lightning: 25.9 (#139)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Yi-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1302 | 1302 |

## Math

- Olmo 3 32b Think: 36.5 (#165)
- Yi-Lightning: 36.2 (#172)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Yi-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1316 | 1300 |

## Knowledge

- Olmo 3 32b Think: 35.0 (#190)
- Yi-Lightning: 35.4 (#185)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Yi-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1273 | 1286 |

## Multilingual

- Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.2 (#210)
- Yi-Lightning: 42.2 (#196)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Yi-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1255 | 1269 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1300 | 1320 |
| LMArena French | 1291 | 1305 |
| LMArena German | 1290 | 1267 |
| LMArena Russian | 1254 | 1255 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1228 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1192 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1315 |

## Instruction Following

- Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.2 (#198)
- Yi-Lightning: 67.4 (#196)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Yi-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1275 | 1278 |

## Long Context

- Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#182)
- Yi-Lightning: 39.4 (#181)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Yi-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1296 | 1297 |

## Writing & Preference

- Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.1 (#193)
- Yi-Lightning: 50.2 (#184)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Yi-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1300 | 1302 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1256 | 1280 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1290 | 1311 |

## FAQ

### Is Olmo 3 32b Think better than Yi-Lightning?

Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.7 to 37.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Olmo 3 32b Think or Yi-Lightning better for coding?

Olmo 3 32b Think scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.6 versus 27.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Olmo 3 32b Think and Yi-Lightning share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 3 32b Think has 14 scored results on Noometry and Yi-Lightning has 18.