# Olmo 3 32b Think vs Sonar

> Olmo 3 32b Think and Sonar score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.7 vs 38.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/olmo-3-32b-think-vs-sonar
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Olmo 3 32b Think leads 25.9 to 21.1.
- Olmo 3 32b Think has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Olmo 3 32b Think | Sonar |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Perplexity |
| Noometry Index | 38.7 | 38.5 |
| Rank | 183 | 187 |
| Context | — | 128K |
| Input $/M | — | $1 |
| Output $/M | — | $1 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.6 (#172)
- Sonar: 35.7 (#221)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Sonar |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Coding | — | 35.1% |
| LMArena Coding | 1319 | — |

## Reasoning

- Olmo 3 32b Think: 25.9 (#140)
- Sonar: 21.1 (#227)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Sonar |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 46.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1302 | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 37.9% |
| LiveBench | — | 46.9% |

## Math

- Olmo 3 32b Think: 36.5 (#165)
- Sonar: 33.7 (#200)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Sonar |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | — | 41.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1316 | — |

## Knowledge

- Olmo 3 32b Think: 35.0 (#190)
- Sonar: —

| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Sonar |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1273 | — |

## Multilingual

- Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.2 (#210)
- Sonar: —

| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Sonar |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1255 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1300 | — |
| LMArena French | 1291 | — |
| LMArena German | 1290 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1254 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.2 (#198)
- Sonar: 71.4 (#150)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Sonar |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 76.2% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1275 | — |

## Long Context

- Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#182)
- Sonar: —

| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Sonar |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1296 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.1 (#193)
- Sonar: 52.6 (#167)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Sonar |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1300 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1256 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1290 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 44.1% |

## FAQ

### Is Olmo 3 32b Think better than Sonar?

Olmo 3 32b Think and Sonar score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.7 vs 38.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Olmo 3 32b Think or Sonar better for coding?

Olmo 3 32b Think scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.6 versus 35.7 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Olmo 3 32b Think and Sonar share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 3 32b Think has 14 scored results on Noometry and Sonar has 7.