# Olmo 3 32b Think vs Solar Pro4

> Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 38.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/olmo-3-32b-think-vs-solar-pro4
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 14

## Summary

- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Olmo 3 32b Think scores higher in 0 categories and Solar Pro4 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Solar Pro4 leads 49.0 to 41.4.
- Olmo 3 32b Think has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Olmo 3 32b Think | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Upstage |
| Noometry Index | 38.1 | 41.5 |
| Rank | 182 | 123 |
| Context | — | 524K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.30 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.20 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.0 (#169)
- Solar Pro4: 39.9 (#135)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1318 | 1439 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1371 |

## Reasoning

- Olmo 3 32b Think: 24.9 (#138)
- Solar Pro4: 27.3 (#107)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1302 | 1398 |

## Math

- Olmo 3 32b Think: 33.8 (#165)
- Solar Pro4: 36.1 (#129)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1315 | 1418 |

## Knowledge

- Olmo 3 32b Think: 34.4 (#189)
- Solar Pro4: 39.0 (#128)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1272 | 1421 |

## Multilingual

- Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.4 (#205)
- Solar Pro4: 49.0 (#134)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1255 | 1362 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1300 | 1417 |
| LMArena French | 1291 | 1403 |
| LMArena German | 1290 | 1351 |
| LMArena Russian | 1255 | 1360 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1300 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1383 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1408 |

## Instruction Following

- Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.4 (#193)
- Solar Pro4: 72.8 (#128)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1275 | 1376 |

## Long Context

- Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#177)
- Solar Pro4: 42.0 (#125)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1296 | 1379 |

## Writing & Preference

- Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.2 (#188)
- Solar Pro4: 56.7 (#133)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1300 | 1386 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1256 | 1313 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1289 | 1391 |

## FAQ

### Is Olmo 3 32b Think better than Solar Pro4?

Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 38.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Olmo 3 32b Think or Solar Pro4 better for coding?

Solar Pro4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.9 versus 38.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Olmo 3 32b Think and Solar Pro4 share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 3 32b Think has 14 scored results on Noometry and Solar Pro4 has 18.