# Olmo 3 32b Think vs Qwen3 Max

> Qwen3 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 38.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/olmo-3-32b-think-vs-qwen3-max
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 14

## Summary

- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Olmo 3 32b Think scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3 Max in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3 Max leads 48.1 to 34.4.
- Olmo 3 32b Think has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Olmo 3 32b Think | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 38.1 | 43.5 |
| Rank | 182 | 82 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $1.20 |
| Output $/M | — | $6 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.0 (#169)
- Qwen3 Max: 42.4 (#93)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1318 | 1456 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 370.45 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Olmo 3 32b Think: —
- Qwen3 Max: —

| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 71.56 |

## Reasoning

- Olmo 3 32b Think: 24.9 (#138)
- Qwen3 Max: 22.0 (#186)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1302 | 1448 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 72.5% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 30.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 4% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 5% |
| DTBench | — | 82.1% |
| LMCA | — | 28.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 142.41 |

## Math

- Olmo 3 32b Think: 33.8 (#165)
- Qwen3 Max: 37.6 (#94)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1315 | 1447 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 18.9% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 73.3% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 97.1% |

## Knowledge

- Olmo 3 32b Think: 34.4 (#189)
- Qwen3 Max: 48.1 (#72)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1272 | 1457 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 72.6% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 48.7% |

## Multilingual

- Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.4 (#205)
- Qwen3 Max: 53.9 (#58)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1255 | 1429 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1300 | 1479 |
| LMArena French | 1291 | 1450 |
| LMArena German | 1290 | 1463 |
| LMArena Russian | 1255 | 1428 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1399 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1397 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1463 |

## Instruction Following

- Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.4 (#193)
- Qwen3 Max: 75.0 (#81)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1275 | 1420 |

## Long Context

- Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#177)
- Qwen3 Max: 41.6 (#129)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1296 | 1439 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 66.7% |
| CL-bench | — | 14.5% |

## Writing & Preference

- Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.2 (#188)
- Qwen3 Max: 62.6 (#72)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1300 | 1439 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1256 | 1401 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1289 | 1446 |

## FAQ

### Is Olmo 3 32b Think better than Qwen3 Max?

Qwen3 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 38.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Olmo 3 32b Think or Qwen3 Max better for coding?

Qwen3 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 38.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Olmo 3 32b Think and Qwen3 Max share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 3 32b Think has 14 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Max has 33.