# Olmo 3 32b Think vs Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct

> Olmo 3 32b Think and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.1 vs 37.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/olmo-3-32b-think-vs-qwen3-coder-480b-a35b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 14

## Summary

- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Olmo 3 32b Think scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct in 6 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads 47.8 to 41.4.

## Snapshot

| | Olmo 3 32b Think | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 38.1 | 37.7 |
| Rank | 182 | 186 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $1.50 |
| Output $/M | — | $7.50 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.0 (#169)
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 36.2 (#199)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1318 | 1413 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 55.4% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1275 |
| GSO | — | 4.9% |
| WeirdML | — | 41.2% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 461.45 |
| AlgoTune | — | 1.44 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Olmo 3 32b Think: —
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 23.7 (#116)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 27.2% |

## Reasoning

- Olmo 3 32b Think: 24.9 (#138)
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 24.7 (#141)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1302 | 1372 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 49.5% |

## Math

- Olmo 3 32b Think: 33.8 (#165)
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 34.9 (#151)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1315 | 1364 |

## Knowledge

- Olmo 3 32b Think: 34.4 (#189)
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 36.4 (#159)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1272 | 1337 |

## Multilingual

- Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.4 (#205)
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 47.8 (#143)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1255 | 1345 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1300 | 1356 |
| LMArena French | 1291 | 1394 |
| LMArena German | 1290 | 1324 |
| LMArena Russian | 1255 | 1367 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1309 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1307 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1360 |

## Instruction Following

- Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.4 (#193)
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 71.8 (#142)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1275 | 1356 |

## Long Context

- Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#177)
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 42.0 (#126)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1296 | 1379 |

## Writing & Preference

- Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.2 (#188)
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 55.5 (#142)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1300 | 1356 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1256 | 1333 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1289 | 1365 |

## FAQ

### Is Olmo 3 32b Think better than Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct?

Olmo 3 32b Think and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.1 vs 37.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Olmo 3 32b Think or Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct better for coding?

Olmo 3 32b Think scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.0 versus 36.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Olmo 3 32b Think and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 3 32b Think has 14 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has 25.