# Olmo 3 32b Think vs Qwen3 8B

> Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.7 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/olmo-3-32b-think-vs-qwen3-8b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Olmo 3 32b Think leads 25.9 to 16.6.

## Snapshot

| | Olmo 3 32b Think | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 38.7 | 33.7 |
| Rank | 183 | 238 |
| Context | — | 131K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.18 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.70 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.6 (#172)
- Qwen3 8B: 34.0 (#248)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 22.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1319 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Olmo 3 32b Think: —
- Qwen3 8B: 30.2 (#78)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 42.6% |

## Reasoning

- Olmo 3 32b Think: 25.9 (#140)
- Qwen3 8B: 16.6 (#303)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 5% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1302 | — |
| DTBench | — | 59.7% |
| LMCA | — | 8.8% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 136.17 |

## Math

- Olmo 3 32b Think: 36.5 (#165)
- Qwen3 8B: 34.9 (#191)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 56.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1316 | — |

## Knowledge

- Olmo 3 32b Think: 35.0 (#190)
- Qwen3 8B: 36.1 (#173)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 56.8% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 4.8% |
| LMArena Expert | 1273 | — |

## Multilingual

- Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.2 (#210)
- Qwen3 8B: —

| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1255 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1300 | — |
| LMArena French | 1291 | — |
| LMArena German | 1290 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1254 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.2 (#198)
- Qwen3 8B: —

| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1275 | — |

## Long Context

- Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#182)
- Qwen3 8B: 37.9 (#210)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 62.1% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1296 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.1 (#193)
- Qwen3 8B: —

| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1300 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1256 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1290 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Olmo 3 32b Think better than Qwen3 8B?

Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.7 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Olmo 3 32b Think or Qwen3 8B better for coding?

Olmo 3 32b Think scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.6 versus 34.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Olmo 3 32b Think and Qwen3 8B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 3 32b Think has 14 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 8B has 11.