# Olmo 3 32b Think vs Qwen3-4B

> Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.7 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/olmo-3-32b-think-vs-qwen3-4b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in math, where Olmo 3 32b Think leads 36.5 to 29.7.

## Snapshot

| | Olmo 3 32b Think | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 38.7 | 31.9 |
| Rank | 183 | 264 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.6 (#172)
- Qwen3-4B: —

| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1319 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Olmo 3 32b Think: —
- Qwen3-4B: 27.6 (#100)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 35.7% |

## Reasoning

- Olmo 3 32b Think: 25.9 (#140)
- Qwen3-4B: 19.2 (#268)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | — | 4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1302 | — |

## Math

- Olmo 3 32b Think: 36.5 (#165)
- Qwen3-4B: 29.7 (#240)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 38.5% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 52.2% |
| LMArena Math | 1316 | — |

## Knowledge

- Olmo 3 32b Think: 35.0 (#190)
- Qwen3-4B: 33.0 (#208)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 52.3% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1273 | — |

## Multilingual

- Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.2 (#210)
- Qwen3-4B: —

| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1255 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1300 | — |
| LMArena French | 1291 | — |
| LMArena German | 1290 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1254 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.2 (#198)
- Qwen3-4B: —

| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1275 | — |

## Long Context

- Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#182)
- Qwen3-4B: —

| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1296 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.1 (#193)
- Qwen3-4B: —

| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1300 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1256 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1290 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Olmo 3 32b Think better than Qwen3-4B?

Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.7 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Olmo 3 32b Think and Qwen3-4B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 3 32b Think has 14 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-4B has 6.
