# Olmo 3 32b Think vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127

> Olmo 3 32b Think and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.7 vs 38.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/olmo-3-32b-think-vs-qwen2-5-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Olmo 3 32b Think scores higher in 5 categories and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 in 3 categories, but none of those gaps is larger than the uncertainty.
- Olmo 3 32b Think has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Olmo 3 32b Think | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 38.7 | 38.8 |
| Rank | 183 | 181 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.6 (#172)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 38.5 (#175)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1319 | 1314 |

## Reasoning

- Olmo 3 32b Think: 25.9 (#140)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 25.9 (#141)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1302 | 1299 |

## Math

- Olmo 3 32b Think: 36.5 (#165)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 36.1 (#174)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1316 | 1298 |

## Knowledge

- Olmo 3 32b Think: 35.0 (#190)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 35.5 (#183)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1273 | 1289 |

## Multilingual

- Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.2 (#210)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 41.9 (#201)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1255 | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1300 | 1314 |
| LMArena German | 1290 | 1231 |
| LMArena Russian | 1254 | 1271 |
| LMArena French | 1291 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1207 |

## Instruction Following

- Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.2 (#198)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.2 (#199)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1275 | 1275 |

## Long Context

- Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#182)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#184)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1296 | 1292 |

## Writing & Preference

- Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.1 (#193)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.4 (#192)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1300 | 1299 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1256 | 1262 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1290 | 1299 |

## FAQ

### Is Olmo 3 32b Think better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?

Olmo 3 32b Think and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.7 vs 38.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Olmo 3 32b Think or Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (38.6 vs 38.5); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### How many benchmarks do Olmo 3 32b Think and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 3 32b Think has 14 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.