# Olmo 3 32b Think vs Qwen1.5-7B

> Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.7 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/olmo-3-32b-think-vs-qwen1-5-7b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Olmo 3 32b Think scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen1.5-7B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Olmo 3 32b Think leads 49.1 to 29.6.

## Snapshot

| | Olmo 3 32b Think | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 38.7 | 31.4 |
| Rank | 183 | 273 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.6 (#172)
- Qwen1.5-7B: 32.2 (#276)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1319 | 1107 |

## Reasoning

- Olmo 3 32b Think: 25.9 (#140)
- Qwen1.5-7B: 20.4 (#240)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1302 | 1065 |

## Math

- Olmo 3 32b Think: 36.5 (#165)
- Qwen1.5-7B: 31.4 (#224)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1316 | 1080 |

## Knowledge

- Olmo 3 32b Think: 35.0 (#190)
- Qwen1.5-7B: 28.7 (#243)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1273 | 1055 |
| MMLU | — | 62.6% |

## Multilingual

- Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.2 (#210)
- Qwen1.5-7B: 28.5 (#271)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1255 | 1058 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1300 | 1141 |
| LMArena Russian | 1254 | 1006 |
| LMArena French | 1291 | — |
| LMArena German | 1290 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.2 (#198)
- Qwen1.5-7B: 54.1 (#281)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1275 | 1058 |

## Long Context

- Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#182)
- Qwen1.5-7B: 33.1 (#266)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1296 | 1090 |

## Writing & Preference

- Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.1 (#193)
- Qwen1.5-7B: 29.6 (#293)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1300 | 1083 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1256 | 1035 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1290 | 1062 |

## FAQ

### Is Olmo 3 32b Think better than Qwen1.5-7B?

Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.7 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Olmo 3 32b Think or Qwen1.5-7B better for coding?

Olmo 3 32b Think scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.6 versus 32.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Olmo 3 32b Think and Qwen1.5-7B share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 3 32b Think has 14 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-7B has 13.