# Olmo 3 32b Think vs Qwen Plus

> Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/olmo-3-32b-think-vs-qwen-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Olmo 3 32b Think scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen Plus in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Olmo 3 32b Think leads 33.8 to 22.0.
- Olmo 3 32b Think has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Olmo 3 32b Think | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 38.1 | 36.7 |
| Rank | 182 | 204 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.20 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.0 (#169)
- Qwen Plus: 38.3 (#163)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1318 | 1328 |

## Reasoning

- Olmo 3 32b Think: 24.9 (#138)
- Qwen Plus: 27.6 (#101)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1302 | 1317 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 63.3% |
| DTBench | — | 81.1% |
| LMCA | — | 24% |

## Math

- Olmo 3 32b Think: 33.8 (#165)
- Qwen Plus: 22.0 (#266)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1315 | 1326 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 17.8% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 65.3% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1.7% |

## Knowledge

- Olmo 3 32b Think: 34.4 (#189)
- Qwen Plus: 27.4 (#245)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1272 | 1328 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 48.1% |

## Multilingual

- Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.4 (#205)
- Qwen Plus: 45.3 (#170)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1255 | 1310 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1300 | 1347 |
| LMArena Russian | 1255 | 1323 |
| LMArena French | 1291 | — |
| LMArena German | 1290 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1251 |

## Instruction Following

- Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.4 (#193)
- Qwen Plus: 69.0 (#176)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1275 | 1303 |

## Long Context

- Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#177)
- Qwen Plus: 40.3 (#153)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1296 | 1325 |

## Writing & Preference

- Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.2 (#188)
- Qwen Plus: 52.4 (#171)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3 32b Think | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1300 | 1326 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1256 | 1293 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1289 | 1336 |

## FAQ

### Is Olmo 3 32b Think better than Qwen Plus?

Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Olmo 3 32b Think or Qwen Plus better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (38.0 vs 38.3); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### How many benchmarks do Olmo 3 32b Think and Qwen Plus share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 3 32b Think has 14 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Plus has 20.