# Olmo 3.1 32b Think vs Ring-2.6-1T

> Olmo 3.1 32b Think has enough public results to be ranked (#191); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/olmo-3-1-32b-think-vs-ring-2-6-1t
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Snapshot

| | Olmo 3.1 32b Think | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Ant Group (inclusionAI) |
| Noometry Index | 37.9 | 36.9 |
| Rank | 191 | — |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 37.7 (#189)
- Ring-2.6-1T: 40.7

| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Think | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 42.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1291 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 432.57 |

## Reasoning

- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 25.2 (#150)
- Ring-2.6-1T: 26.1

| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Think | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 3.7% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1272 | — |

## Math

- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 36.3 (#168)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Think | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1305 | — |

## Knowledge

- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 35.7 (#181)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Think | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1295 | — |

## Multilingual

- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.1 (#231)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Think | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1209 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1242 | — |
| LMArena French | 1260 | — |
| LMArena German | 1262 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1193 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1289 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 65.6 (#218)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Think | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1247 | — |

## Long Context

- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.6 (#195)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Think | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1272 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 46.2 (#220)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Think | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1272 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1226 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1252 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Olmo 3.1 32b Think better than Ring-2.6-1T?

Olmo 3.1 32b Think has enough public results to be ranked (#191); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

### Is Olmo 3.1 32b Think or Ring-2.6-1T better for coding?

Ring-2.6-1T scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.7 versus 37.7 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Olmo 3.1 32b Think and Ring-2.6-1T share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 3.1 32b Think has 15 scored results on Noometry and Ring-2.6-1T has 3.