# Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct vs Trinity Large Thinking

> Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct and Trinity Large Thinking score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.8 vs 38.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/olmo-3-1-32b-instruct-vs-trinity-large-thinking
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 16

## Summary

- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct scores higher in 2 categories and Trinity Large Thinking in 6 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads 25.4 to 16.3.

## Snapshot

| | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Arcee AI |
| Noometry Index | 38.8 | 38.1 |
| Rank | 168 | 180 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.25 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.80 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 38.9 (#154)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 33.8 (#238)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1346 | 1381 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1238 |
| SciCode | — | 36.1% |

## Reasoning

- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 25.4 (#131)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 16.3 (#298)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1322 | 1350 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 16.5% |
| CritPt | — | 0.9% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 41.6% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 15.6% |

## Math

- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 33.6 (#169)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 34.9 (#149)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1305 | 1366 |

## Knowledge

- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 35.4 (#175)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 40.3 (#107)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1307 | 1359 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 6.9% |

## Multilingual

- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.8 (#185)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 46.4 (#155)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1275 | 1325 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1304 | 1372 |
| LMArena French | 1328 | 1374 |
| LMArena German | 1283 | 1356 |
| LMArena Korean | 1206 | 1304 |
| LMArena Russian | 1268 | 1338 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1337 | 1356 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1312 |

## Instruction Following

- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.8 (#182)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 70.7 (#157)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1298 | 1334 |

## Long Context

- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#161)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 41.2 (#139)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1312 | 1355 |

## Writing & Preference

- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.4 (#179)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 54.0 (#152)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1311 | 1340 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1264 | 1321 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1309 | 1342 |

## FAQ

### Is Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct better than Trinity Large Thinking?

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct and Trinity Large Thinking score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.8 vs 38.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct or Trinity Large Thinking better for coding?

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.9 versus 33.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct and Trinity Large Thinking share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16 scored results on Noometry and Trinity Large Thinking has 24.