# Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct vs Sonar

> Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct and Sonar score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.8 vs 37.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/olmo-3-1-32b-instruct-vs-sonar
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads 25.4 to 20.3.
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Sonar |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Perplexity |
| Noometry Index | 38.8 | 37.8 |
| Rank | 168 | 184 |
| Context | — | 128K |
| Input $/M | — | $1 |
| Output $/M | — | $1 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 38.9 (#154)
- Sonar: 35.1 (#217)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Sonar |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Coding | — | 35.1% |
| LMArena Coding | 1346 | — |

## Reasoning

- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 25.4 (#131)
- Sonar: 20.3 (#221)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Sonar |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 46.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1322 | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 37.9% |
| LiveBench | — | 46.9% |

## Math

- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 33.6 (#169)
- Sonar: 31.3 (#197)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Sonar |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | — | 41.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1305 | — |

## Knowledge

- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 35.4 (#175)
- Sonar: —

| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Sonar |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1307 | — |

## Multilingual

- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.8 (#185)
- Sonar: —

| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Sonar |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1275 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1304 | — |
| LMArena French | 1328 | — |
| LMArena German | 1283 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1206 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1268 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1337 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.8 (#182)
- Sonar: 71.5 (#146)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Sonar |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 76.2% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1298 | — |

## Long Context

- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#161)
- Sonar: —

| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Sonar |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1312 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.4 (#179)
- Sonar: 52.6 (#166)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Sonar |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1311 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1264 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1309 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 44.1% |

## FAQ

### Is Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct better than Sonar?

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct and Sonar score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.8 vs 37.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct or Sonar better for coding?

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.9 versus 35.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct and Sonar share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16 scored results on Noometry and Sonar has 7.