# Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct vs Qwen3 Max

> Qwen3 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.7 to 39.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/olmo-3-1-32b-instruct-vs-qwen3-max
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 16

## Summary

- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3 Max in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3 Max leads 62.4 to 50.2.
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 39.4 | 43.7 |
| Rank | 168 | 87 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $1.20 |
| Output $/M | — | $6 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.5 (#157)
- Qwen3 Max: 43.0 (#93)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1347 | 1456 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 370.45 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: —
- Qwen3 Max: —

| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 71.56 |

## Reasoning

- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 26.4 (#132)
- Qwen3 Max: 22.6 (#190)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1322 | 1448 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 72.5% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 30.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 4% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 5% |
| DTBench | — | 82.1% |
| LMCA | — | 28.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 142.38 |

## Math

- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.3 (#167)
- Qwen3 Max: 38.7 (#131)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1305 | 1446 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 18.9% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 73.3% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 97.1% |

## Knowledge

- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.1 (#175)
- Qwen3 Max: 48.1 (#78)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1308 | 1455 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 72.6% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 48.7% |

## Multilingual

- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.6 (#191)
- Qwen3 Max: 53.7 (#62)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1275 | 1429 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1304 | 1478 |
| LMArena French | 1328 | 1449 |
| LMArena German | 1282 | 1463 |
| LMArena Korean | 1206 | 1399 |
| LMArena Russian | 1268 | 1428 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1336 | 1462 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1397 |

## Instruction Following

- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.6 (#187)
- Qwen3 Max: 74.8 (#87)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1299 | 1419 |

## Long Context

- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#166)
- Qwen3 Max: 41.6 (#134)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1312 | 1438 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 66.7% |
| CL-bench | — | 14.5% |

## Writing & Preference

- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.2 (#185)
- Qwen3 Max: 62.4 (#76)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1311 | 1439 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1264 | 1402 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1309 | 1446 |

## FAQ

### Is Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct better than Qwen3 Max?

Qwen3 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.7 to 39.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct or Qwen3 Max better for coding?

Qwen3 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.0 versus 39.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct and Qwen3 Max share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Max has 33.