# Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct vs Qwen3 8B

> Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 33.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/olmo-3-1-32b-instruct-vs-qwen3-8b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads 25.4 to 16.1.

## Snapshot

| | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 38.8 | 33.3 |
| Rank | 168 | 237 |
| Context | — | 131K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.18 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.70 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 38.9 (#154)
- Qwen3 8B: 33.4 (#245)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 22.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1346 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: —
- Qwen3 8B: 29.9 (#71)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 42.6% |

## Reasoning

- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 25.4 (#131)
- Qwen3 8B: 16.1 (#299)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 5% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1322 | — |
| DTBench | — | 59.7% |
| LMCA | — | 8.8% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 136.17 |

## Math

- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 33.6 (#169)
- Qwen3 8B: 33.3 (#176)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 56.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1305 | — |

## Knowledge

- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 35.4 (#175)
- Qwen3 8B: 36.1 (#164)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 56.8% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 4.8% |
| LMArena Expert | 1307 | — |

## Multilingual

- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.8 (#185)
- Qwen3 8B: —

| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1275 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1304 | — |
| LMArena French | 1328 | — |
| LMArena German | 1283 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1206 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1268 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1337 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.8 (#182)
- Qwen3 8B: —

| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1298 | — |

## Long Context

- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#161)
- Qwen3 8B: 37.8 (#205)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 62.1% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1312 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.4 (#179)
- Qwen3 8B: —

| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1311 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1264 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1309 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct better than Qwen3 8B?

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 33.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct or Qwen3 8B better for coding?

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.9 versus 33.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct and Qwen3 8B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 8B has 11.