# Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct vs Qwen3.6 Plus

> Qwen3.6 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.5 to 39.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/olmo-3-1-32b-instruct-vs-qwen3-6-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 16

## Summary

- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.6 Plus in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.6 Plus leads 56.1 to 36.1.
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 39.4 | 47.5 |
| Rank | 168 | 62 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.50 |
| Output $/M | — | $3 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.5 (#157)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 40.8 (#130)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1347 | 1467 |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 57.9% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1461 |
| SciCode | — | 40.7% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 670.15 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: —
- Qwen3.6 Plus: —

| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 5,115 |

## Reasoning

- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 26.4 (#132)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 29.3 (#93)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1322 | 1449 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 60.3% |
| CritPt | — | 2.9% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 17% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 59.5% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 12% |
| DTBench | — | 81.9% |
| LMCA | — | 33.1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 147.65 |

## Math

- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.3 (#167)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 51.8 (#54)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1305 | 1450 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 38.2% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 93.3% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 26.2% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 8.3% |

## Knowledge

- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.1 (#175)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 56.1 (#45)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1308 | 1454 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 88.4% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 44.1% |

## Multilingual

- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.6 (#191)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 53.3 (#70)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1275 | 1424 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1304 | 1477 |
| LMArena French | 1328 | 1455 |
| LMArena German | 1282 | 1452 |
| LMArena Korean | 1206 | 1379 |
| LMArena Russian | 1268 | 1434 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1336 | 1432 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1389 |

## Instruction Following

- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.6 (#187)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 75.0 (#74)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1299 | 1425 |

## Long Context

- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#166)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 45.2 (#49)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1312 | 1439 |
| CL-bench | — | 20.3% |

## Writing & Preference

- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.2 (#185)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 62.2 (#82)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1311 | 1437 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1264 | 1404 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1309 | 1438 |

## FAQ

### Is Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct better than Qwen3.6 Plus?

Qwen3.6 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.5 to 39.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct or Qwen3.6 Plus better for coding?

Qwen3.6 Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.8 versus 39.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct and Qwen3.6 Plus share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Plus has 37.