# Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct vs Qwen3.5-Flash

> Qwen3.5-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 39.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/olmo-3-1-32b-instruct-vs-qwen3-5-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 16

## Summary

- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3.5-Flash in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Qwen3.5-Flash leads 50.5 to 42.6.
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 39.4 | 42.5 |
| Rank | 168 | 112 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.10 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.40 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.5 (#157)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 34.2 (#242)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1347 | 1412 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1244 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 221.8 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: —
- Qwen3.5-Flash: —

| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 462.69 |

## Reasoning

- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 26.4 (#132)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 33.7 (#72)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1322 | 1403 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 21% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 20% |
| DTBench | — | 82.9% |
| LMCA | — | 29.1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 143.98 |

## Math

- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.3 (#167)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 37.4 (#158)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1305 | 1407 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 18.2% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 84.4% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 6.2% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 0% |

## Knowledge

- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.1 (#175)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 43.2 (#93)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1308 | 1407 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 82.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 20.3% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 10.5% |

## Multilingual

- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.6 (#191)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 50.5 (#121)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1275 | 1385 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1304 | 1446 |
| LMArena French | 1328 | 1412 |
| LMArena German | 1282 | 1390 |
| LMArena Korean | 1206 | 1344 |
| LMArena Russian | 1268 | 1379 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1336 | 1400 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1368 |

## Instruction Following

- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.6 (#187)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 72.6 (#139)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1299 | 1374 |

## Long Context

- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#166)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 42.4 (#124)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1312 | 1392 |

## Writing & Preference

- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.2 (#185)
- Qwen3.5-Flash: 57.9 (#122)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen3.5-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1311 | 1397 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1264 | 1343 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1309 | 1393 |

## FAQ

### Is Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct better than Qwen3.5-Flash?

Qwen3.5-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 39.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct or Qwen3.5-Flash better for coding?

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.5 versus 34.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct and Qwen3.5-Flash share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5-Flash has 32.