# Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct vs Qwen3.5-9B

> Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 33.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/olmo-3-1-32b-instruct-vs-qwen3-5-9b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.5-9B leads 46.0 to 36.1.

## Snapshot

| | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 39.4 | 33.8 |
| Rank | 168 | 236 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.10 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.15 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.5 (#157)
- Qwen3.5-9B: 35.9 (#217)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 27.5% |
| LMArena Coding | 1347 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: —
- Qwen3.5-9B: 14.5 (#151)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 9.2% |

## Reasoning

- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 26.4 (#132)
- Qwen3.5-9B: 23.1 (#182)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 12% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1322 | — |
| DTBench | — | 71.2% |
| LMCA | — | 24.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 139.46 |

## Math

- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.3 (#167)
- Qwen3.5-9B: 34.8 (#192)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 48.5% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 61.7% |
| LMArena Math | 1305 | — |

## Knowledge

- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.1 (#175)
- Qwen3.5-9B: 46.0 (#84)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 79% |
| LMArena Expert | 1308 | — |

## Multilingual

- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.6 (#191)
- Qwen3.5-9B: —

| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1275 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1304 | — |
| LMArena French | 1328 | — |
| LMArena German | 1282 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1206 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1268 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1336 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.6 (#187)
- Qwen3.5-9B: —

| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1299 | — |

## Long Context

- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#166)
- Qwen3.5-9B: —

| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1312 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.2 (#185)
- Qwen3.5-9B: —

| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen3.5-9B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1311 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1264 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1309 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct better than Qwen3.5-9B?

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 33.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct or Qwen3.5-9B better for coding?

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.5 versus 35.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct and Qwen3.5-9B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5-9B has 10.