# Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

> Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 28.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/olmo-3-1-32b-instruct-vs-qwen2-5-7b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in math, where Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads 33.6 to 11.8.

## Snapshot

| | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 38.8 | 28.6 |
| Rank | 168 | 314 |
| Context | — | 131K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.17 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.70 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 38.9 (#154)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 35.9 (#204)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 37.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1346 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 46.1% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: —
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 23.5 (#117)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | — | 7.8% |

## Reasoning

- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 25.4 (#131)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 14.3 (#317)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1322 | — |
| DTBench | — | 47.7% |
| LMCA | — | 6.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 118.44 |

## Math

- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 33.6 (#169)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 11.8 (#300)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 2.5% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 29.4% |
| LMArena Math | 1305 | — |

## Knowledge

- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 35.4 (#175)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 17.0 (#281)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 35.5% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 53.9% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 34.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1307 | — |
| MMLU | — | 72.9% |

## Multilingual

- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.8 (#185)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1275 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1304 | — |
| LMArena French | 1328 | — |
| LMArena German | 1283 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1206 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1268 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1337 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.8 (#182)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 63.4 (#226)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | — | 74.1% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1298 | — |

## Long Context

- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#161)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1312 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.4 (#179)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 48.8 (#194)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1311 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1264 | — |
| WildBench | — | 73.1% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1309 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct better than Qwen2.5 7B Instruct?

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 28.6 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct or Qwen2.5 7B Instruct better for coding?

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.9 versus 35.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has 15.