# Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct vs phi-3-medium 14B

> Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/olmo-3-1-32b-instruct-vs-phi-3-medium-14b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads 35.4 to 9.1.

## Snapshot

| | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 38.8 | 29.1 |
| Rank | 168 | 306 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 38.9 (#154)
- phi-3-medium 14B: 36.3 (#198)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 37.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1346 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 48.7% |

## Reasoning

- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 25.4 (#131)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1322 | — |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 55.8% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 81.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 121.18 |
| HellaSwag | — | 82.4% |
| WinoGrande | — | 81.5% |

## Math

- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 33.6 (#169)
- phi-3-medium 14B: 25.2 (#249)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1305 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 17.6% |

## Knowledge

- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 35.4 (#175)
- phi-3-medium 14B: 9.1 (#301)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 27.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1307 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 91.6% |
| MMLU | — | 78% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 87.4% |
| TriviaQA | — | 73.9% |

## Multilingual

- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.8 (#185)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1275 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1304 | — |
| LMArena French | 1328 | — |
| LMArena German | 1283 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1206 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1268 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1337 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.8 (#182)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1298 | — |

## Long Context

- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#161)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1312 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.4 (#179)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1311 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1264 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1309 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct better than phi-3-medium 14B?

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct or phi-3-medium 14B better for coding?

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.9 versus 36.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct and phi-3-medium 14B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16 scored results on Noometry and phi-3-medium 14B has 13.