# Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct vs Olmo 3.1 32b Think

> Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/olmo-3-1-32b-instruct-vs-olmo-3-1-32b-think
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 15

## Summary

- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct scores higher in 7 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Think in 1 category; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads 42.6 to 38.1.

## Snapshot

| | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 39.4 | 37.9 |
| Rank | 168 | 191 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.5 (#157)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 37.7 (#189)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1347 | 1291 |

## Reasoning

- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 26.4 (#132)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 25.2 (#150)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1322 | 1272 |

## Math

- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.3 (#167)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 36.3 (#168)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1305 | 1305 |

## Knowledge

- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.1 (#175)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 35.7 (#181)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1308 | 1295 |

## Multilingual

- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.6 (#191)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.1 (#231)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1275 | 1209 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1304 | 1242 |
| LMArena French | 1328 | 1260 |
| LMArena German | 1282 | 1262 |
| LMArena Russian | 1268 | 1193 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1336 | 1289 |
| LMArena Korean | 1206 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.6 (#187)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 65.6 (#218)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1299 | 1247 |

## Long Context

- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#166)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.6 (#195)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1312 | 1272 |

## Writing & Preference

- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.2 (#185)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 46.2 (#220)

| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1311 | 1272 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1264 | 1226 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1309 | 1252 |

## FAQ

### Is Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct better than Olmo 3.1 32b Think?

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct or Olmo 3.1 32b Think better for coding?

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.5 versus 37.7 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct and Olmo 3.1 32b Think share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Think has 15.