# OLMo 2 Furious 13B vs Step 3

> Step 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.5 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/olmo-2-furious-13b-vs-step-3
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Step 3 leads 36.8 to 18.3.

## Snapshot

| | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | StepFun |
| Noometry Index | 29.7 | 40.5 |
| Rank | 304 | 149 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.6 (#313)
- Step 3: 40.1 (#147)

| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Coding | 10.4% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1367 |

## Reasoning

- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 15.5 (#314)
- Step 3: 28.4 (#105)

| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 62.3% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 16.3% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1355 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 20.6% | — |
| LiveBench | 22.1% | — |

## Math

- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 23.1 (#273)
- Step 3: 37.6 (#148)

| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | 15.6% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 13.6% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1366 |

## Knowledge

- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.3 (#283)
- Step 3: 36.8 (#164)

| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 31% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 31.6% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1333 |

## Multimodal

- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
- Step 3: 35.5 (#86)

| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1177 |

## Multilingual

- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
- Step 3: 46.3 (#159)

| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1327 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1397 |
| LMArena German | — | 1371 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1269 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1331 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1371 |

## Instruction Following

- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 60.9 (#248)
- Step 3: 70.4 (#164)

| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 60.6% | — |
| IFEval | 73% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1332 |

## Long Context

- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
- Step 3: 40.3 (#157)

| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1326 |

## Writing & Preference

- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 42.9 (#230)
- Step 3: 54.3 (#151)

| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1350 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1321 |
| WildBench | 68.9% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1341 |
| LiveBench Language | 11.2% | — |

## FAQ

### Is OLMo 2 Furious 13B better than Step 3?

Step 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.5 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is OLMo 2 Furious 13B or Step 3 better for coding?

Step 3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.1 versus 28.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do OLMo 2 Furious 13B and Step 3 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12 scored results on Noometry and Step 3 has 17.