# OLMo 2 Furious 13B vs Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)

> OLMo 2 Furious 13B has enough public results to be ranked (#301); Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/olmo-2-furious-13b-vs-qwen2-5-coder
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Snapshot

| | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 29.2 | — |
| Rank | 301 | — |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.1 (#309)
- Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Coding | 10.4% | — |

## Reasoning

- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 14.8 (#312)
- Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | 16.3% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 20.6% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 112.93 |
| HellaSwag | — | 76.8% |
| LiveBench | 22.1% | — |
| WinoGrande | — | 72.9% |

## Math

- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 21.3 (#270)
- Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | 15.6% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 13.6% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 86.7% |

## Knowledge

- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.0 (#278)
- Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 31% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 31.6% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 60.9% |
| MMLU | — | 68% |

## Instruction Following

- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 61.1 (#243)
- Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 60.6% | — |
| IFEval | 73% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 43.0 (#226)
- Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| WildBench | 68.9% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 11.2% | — |

## FAQ

### Is OLMo 2 Furious 13B better than Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)?

OLMo 2 Furious 13B has enough public results to be ranked (#301); Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

### How many benchmarks do OLMo 2 Furious 13B and Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) has 6.