# OLMo 2 Furious 13B vs Qwen Plus

> Qwen Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.1 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/olmo-2-furious-13b-vs-qwen-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen Plus leads 28.4 to 15.5.
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 29.7 | 37.1 |
| Rank | 304 | 210 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.20 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.6 (#313)
- Qwen Plus: 38.9 (#167)

| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Coding | 10.4% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1328 |

## Reasoning

- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 15.5 (#314)
- Qwen Plus: 28.4 (#107)

| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 63.3% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 16.3% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1317 |
| DTBench | — | 81.1% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 20.6% | — |
| LMCA | — | 24% |
| LiveBench | 22.1% | — |

## Math

- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 23.1 (#273)
- Qwen Plus: 23.3 (#271)

| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 17.8% |
| Omni-MATH | 15.6% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 13.6% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1326 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 65.3% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1.7% |

## Knowledge

- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.3 (#283)
- Qwen Plus: 27.4 (#251)

| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 48.1% |
| MMLU-Pro | 31% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 31.6% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1328 |

## Multilingual

- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
- Qwen Plus: 45.1 (#175)

| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1310 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1347 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1251 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1323 |

## Instruction Following

- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 60.9 (#248)
- Qwen Plus: 68.8 (#181)

| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 60.6% | — |
| IFEval | 73% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1303 |

## Long Context

- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
- Qwen Plus: 40.3 (#158)

| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1324 |

## Writing & Preference

- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 42.9 (#230)
- Qwen Plus: 52.2 (#176)

| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1326 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1293 |
| WildBench | 68.9% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1336 |
| LiveBench Language | 11.2% | — |

## FAQ

### Is OLMo 2 Furious 13B better than Qwen Plus?

Qwen Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.1 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is OLMo 2 Furious 13B or Qwen Plus better for coding?

Qwen Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.9 versus 28.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do OLMo 2 Furious 13B and Qwen Plus share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Plus has 20.