# OLMo 2 Furious 13B vs Qwen Max

> Qwen Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.7 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/olmo-2-furious-13b-vs-qwen-max
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen Max leads 30.3 to 18.3.
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 29.7 | 34.7 |
| Rank | 304 | 230 |
| Context | — | 33K |
| Input $/M | — | $1.60 |
| Output $/M | — | $6.40 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.6 (#313)
- Qwen Max: 30.7 (#292)

| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | — | 21.8% |
| LiveBench Coding | 10.4% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1288 |

## Reasoning

- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 15.5 (#314)
- Qwen Max: 25.1 (#151)

| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | 16.3% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1269 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 20.6% | — |
| LiveBench | 22.1% | — |

## Math

- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 23.1 (#273)
- Qwen Max: 22.3 (#276)

| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 16.1% |
| Omni-MATH | 15.6% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 13.6% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1275 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 67.2% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1% |

## Knowledge

- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.3 (#283)
- Qwen Max: 30.3 (#228)

| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 56.1% |
| MMLU-Pro | 31% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 31.6% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1248 |

## Multilingual

- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
- Qwen Max: 41.8 (#202)

| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1263 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1254 |
| LMArena French | — | 1330 |
| LMArena German | — | 1254 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1205 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1142 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1274 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1290 |

## Instruction Following

- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 60.9 (#248)
- Qwen Max: 66.5 (#208)

| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 60.6% | — |
| IFEval | 73% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1262 |

## Long Context

- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
- Qwen Max: 39.4 (#180)

| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 66.7% |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1288 |

## Writing & Preference

- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 42.9 (#230)
- Qwen Max: 47.8 (#205)

| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1282 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1248 |
| WildBench | 68.9% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1277 |
| LiveBench Language | 11.2% | — |

## FAQ

### Is OLMo 2 Furious 13B better than Qwen Max?

Qwen Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.7 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is OLMo 2 Furious 13B or Qwen Max better for coding?

Qwen Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 30.7 versus 28.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do OLMo 2 Furious 13B and Qwen Max share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Max has 23.