# OLMo 2 Furious 13B vs Phi-3.5-mini

> OLMo 2 Furious 13B has enough public results to be ranked (#301); Phi-3.5-mini does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/olmo-2-furious-13b-vs-phi-3-5-mini
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in coding, where Phi-3.5-mini leads 34.0 to 28.1.

## Snapshot

| | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 29.2 | 36.4 |
| Rank | 301 | — |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.1 (#309)
- Phi-3.5-mini: 34.0 (#231)

| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 32.8% |
| LiveBench Coding | 10.4% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 38.5% |

## Reasoning

- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 14.8 (#312)
- Phi-3.5-mini: —

| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | 16.3% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 20.6% | — |
| LiveBench | 22.1% | — |
| PIQA | — | 81% |

## Math

- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 21.3 (#270)
- Phi-3.5-mini: —

| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | 15.6% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 13.6% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 86.2% |

## Knowledge

- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.0 (#278)
- Phi-3.5-mini: —

| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 31% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 31.6% | — |
| BoolQ | — | 78% |

## Instruction Following

- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 61.1 (#243)
- Phi-3.5-mini: —

| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 60.6% | — |
| IFEval | 73% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 43.0 (#226)
- Phi-3.5-mini: —

| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| WildBench | 68.9% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 11.2% | — |

## FAQ

### Is OLMo 2 Furious 13B better than Phi-3.5-mini?

OLMo 2 Furious 13B has enough public results to be ranked (#301); Phi-3.5-mini does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

### Is OLMo 2 Furious 13B or Phi-3.5-mini better for coding?

Phi-3.5-mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.0 versus 28.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do OLMo 2 Furious 13B and Phi-3.5-mini share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12 scored results on Noometry and Phi-3.5-mini has 5.