# Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct vs Wizardlm 13b

> Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.7 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/olmo-2-0325-32b-instruct-vs-wizardlm-13b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct scores higher in 6 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads 42.1 to 30.5.

## Snapshot

| | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 32.7 | 31.4 |
| Rank | 254 | 274 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.2 (#227)
- Wizardlm 13b: 30.1 (#298)

| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1210 | 1035 |

## Reasoning

- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 23.6 (#175)
- Wizardlm 13b: 19.4 (#259)

| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1208 | 1018 |

## Math

- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 26.8 (#255)
- Wizardlm 13b: 30.2 (#238)

| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1208 | 1017 |
| Omni-MATH | 16.1% | — |

## Knowledge

- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.5 (#279)
- Wizardlm 13b: —

| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 41.4% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 28.7% | — |

## Multilingual

- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.8 (#248)
- Wizardlm 13b: 27.1 (#277)

| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1160 | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1192 | 1023 |
| LMArena Russian | 1187 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.5 (#244)
- Wizardlm 13b: 53.5 (#285)

| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1186 | 1048 |
| IFEval | 78% | — |

## Long Context

- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#234)
- Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#273)

| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1194 | 1054 |

## Writing & Preference

- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.1 (#236)
- Wizardlm 13b: 30.5 (#287)

| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1218 | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1199 | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1221 | 1047 |
| WildBench | 73.4% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better than Wizardlm 13b?

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.7 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.2 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct and Wizardlm 13b share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.