# Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct vs Solar Pro4

> Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/olmo-2-0325-32b-instruct-vs-solar-pro4
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Solar Pro4 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Solar Pro4 leads 39.8 to 19.5.
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Upstage |
| Noometry Index | 32.7 | 42.1 |
| Rank | 254 | 121 |
| Context | — | 524K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.30 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.20 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.2 (#227)
- Solar Pro4: 40.1 (#149)

| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1210 | 1437 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1371 |

## Reasoning

- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 23.6 (#175)
- Solar Pro4: 28.5 (#104)

| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1208 | 1399 |

## Math

- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 26.8 (#255)
- Solar Pro4: 38.8 (#128)

| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1208 | 1416 |
| Omni-MATH | 16.1% | — |

## Knowledge

- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.5 (#279)
- Solar Pro4: 39.8 (#129)

| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 41.4% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 28.7% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1427 |

## Multilingual

- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.8 (#248)
- Solar Pro4: 48.7 (#139)

| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1160 | 1361 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1192 | 1415 |
| LMArena Russian | 1187 | 1360 |
| LMArena French | — | 1397 |
| LMArena German | — | 1364 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1309 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1382 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1401 |

## Instruction Following

- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.5 (#244)
- Solar Pro4: 72.7 (#132)

| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1186 | 1377 |
| IFEval | 78% | — |

## Long Context

- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#234)
- Solar Pro4: 42.1 (#130)

| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1194 | 1381 |

## Writing & Preference

- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.1 (#236)
- Solar Pro4: 56.5 (#138)

| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1218 | 1386 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1199 | 1316 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1221 | 1385 |
| WildBench | 73.4% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better than Solar Pro4?

Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct or Solar Pro4 better for coding?

Solar Pro4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.1 versus 35.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct and Solar Pro4 share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16 scored results on Noometry and Solar Pro4 has 18.