# Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct vs Qwen3 Max

> Qwen3 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/olmo-2-0325-32b-instruct-vs-qwen3-max
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3 Max in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3 Max leads 48.1 to 19.2.
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 32.2 | 43.5 |
| Rank | 248 | 82 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $1.20 |
| Output $/M | — | $6 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.6 (#222)
- Qwen3 Max: 42.4 (#93)

| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1210 | 1456 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 370.45 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: —
- Qwen3 Max: —

| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 71.56 |

## Reasoning

- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 22.6 (#174)
- Qwen3 Max: 22.0 (#186)

| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1208 | 1448 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 72.5% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 30.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 4% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 5% |
| DTBench | — | 82.1% |
| LMCA | — | 28.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 142.41 |

## Math

- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 24.8 (#255)
- Qwen3 Max: 37.6 (#94)

| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1208 | 1447 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 18.9% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 73.3% |
| Omni-MATH | 16.1% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 97.1% |

## Knowledge

- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.2 (#274)
- Qwen3 Max: 48.1 (#72)

| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 72.6% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 48.7% |
| MMLU-Pro | 41.4% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 28.7% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1457 |

## Multilingual

- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.0 (#243)
- Qwen3 Max: 53.9 (#58)

| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1160 | 1429 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1192 | 1479 |
| LMArena Russian | 1187 | 1428 |
| LMArena French | — | 1450 |
| LMArena German | — | 1463 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1399 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1397 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1463 |

## Instruction Following

- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.8 (#238)
- Qwen3 Max: 75.0 (#81)

| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1186 | 1420 |
| IFEval | 78% | — |

## Long Context

- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#229)
- Qwen3 Max: 41.6 (#129)

| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1194 | 1439 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 66.7% |
| CL-bench | — | 14.5% |

## Writing & Preference

- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.3 (#231)
- Qwen3 Max: 62.6 (#72)

| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1218 | 1439 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1199 | 1401 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1221 | 1446 |
| WildBench | 73.4% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better than Qwen3 Max?

Qwen3 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct or Qwen3 Max better for coding?

Qwen3 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 34.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct and Qwen3 Max share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Max has 33.