# Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct vs Qwen3.6 Flash

> Qwen3.6 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/olmo-2-0325-32b-instruct-vs-qwen3-6-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.6 Flash leads 42.1 to 19.5.
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 32.7 | 38.8 |
| Rank | 254 | 182 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.19 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.13 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.2 (#227)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1210 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 326.4 |

## Reasoning

- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 23.6 (#175)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: 29.0 (#96)

| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | — | 35.2% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 20% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1208 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 18% |
| DTBench | — | 77.1% |
| LMCA | — | 31% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 143.26 |

## Math

- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 26.8 (#255)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: 39.0 (#117)

| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 22.5% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 84.4% |
| Omni-MATH | 16.1% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1208 | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 10.3% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 0% |

## Knowledge

- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.5 (#279)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: 42.1 (#100)

| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 83.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 15.9% |
| MMLU-Pro | 41.4% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 28.7% | — |

## Multilingual

- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.8 (#248)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1160 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1192 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1187 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.5 (#244)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 78% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1186 | — |

## Long Context

- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#234)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1194 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.1 (#236)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1218 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1199 | — |
| WildBench | 73.4% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1221 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better than Qwen3.6 Flash?

Qwen3.6 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct and Qwen3.6 Flash share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Flash has 13.