# Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct vs Qwen3.5 Max Preview

> Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/olmo-2-0325-32b-instruct-vs-qwen3-5-max-preview
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.5 Max Preview in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads 66.0 to 42.1.
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 32.7 | 45.3 |
| Rank | 254 | 71 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.2 (#227)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 44.0 (#77)

| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1210 | 1487 |

## Reasoning

- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 23.6 (#175)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 30.8 (#84)

| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1208 | 1483 |

## Math

- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 26.8 (#255)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 40.1 (#94)

| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1208 | 1474 |
| Omni-MATH | 16.1% | — |

## Knowledge

- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.5 (#279)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 41.8 (#107)

| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 41.4% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 28.7% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1489 |

## Multilingual

- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.8 (#248)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 56.2 (#22)

| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1160 | 1465 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1192 | 1534 |
| LMArena Russian | 1187 | 1471 |
| LMArena French | — | 1484 |
| LMArena German | — | 1487 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1495 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1438 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1470 |

## Instruction Following

- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.5 (#244)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 77.0 (#31)

| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1186 | 1467 |
| IFEval | 78% | — |

## Long Context

- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#234)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 45.2 (#45)

| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1194 | 1476 |

## Writing & Preference

- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.1 (#236)
- Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 66.0 (#41)

| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1218 | 1470 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1199 | 1464 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1221 | 1478 |
| WildBench | 73.4% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better than Qwen3.5 Max Preview?

Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct or Qwen3.5 Max Preview better for coding?

Qwen3.5 Max Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 35.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct and Qwen3.5 Max Preview share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Max Preview has 17.