# Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

> Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.7 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/olmo-2-0325-32b-instruct-vs-qwen2-5-7b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 5

## Summary

- They share 5 benchmarks with published results for both. Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct scores higher in 3 categories and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct in 3 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads 26.8 to 12.6.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Omni-MATH: 16.1% for Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct and 29.4% for Qwen2.5 7B Instruct.

## Snapshot

| | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 32.7 | 29.0 |
| Rank | 254 | 320 |
| Context | — | 131K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.17 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.70 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.2 (#227)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 36.5 (#208)

| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 37.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1210 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 46.1% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: —
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 23.8 (#124)

| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | — | 7.8% |

## Reasoning

- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 23.6 (#175)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 14.8 (#322)

| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1208 | — |
| DTBench | — | 47.7% |
| LMCA | — | 6.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 118.51 |

## Math

- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 26.8 (#255)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 12.6 (#306)

| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | 16.1% | 29.4% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 2.5% |
| LMArena Math | 1208 | — |

## Knowledge

- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.5 (#279)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 17.0 (#286)

| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 41.4% | 53.9% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 28.7% | 34.1% |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 35.5% |
| MMLU | — | 72.9% |

## Multilingual

- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.8 (#248)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1160 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1192 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1187 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.5 (#244)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 63.2 (#231)

| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 78% | 74.1% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1186 | — |

## Long Context

- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#234)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1194 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.1 (#236)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 48.8 (#195)

| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| WildBench | 73.4% | 73.1% |
| LMArena Text | 1218 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1199 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1221 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better than Qwen2.5 7B Instruct?

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.7 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct or Qwen2.5 7B Instruct better for coding?

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.5 versus 35.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct share?

5 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has 15.