# Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct vs Qwen Plus

> Qwen Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/olmo-2-0325-32b-instruct-vs-qwen-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct scores higher in 1 category and Qwen Plus in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Qwen Plus leads 45.3 to 35.0.
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 32.2 | 36.7 |
| Rank | 248 | 204 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.20 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.6 (#222)
- Qwen Plus: 38.3 (#163)

| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1210 | 1328 |

## Reasoning

- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 22.6 (#174)
- Qwen Plus: 27.6 (#101)

| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1208 | 1317 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 63.3% |
| DTBench | — | 81.1% |
| LMCA | — | 24% |

## Math

- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 24.8 (#255)
- Qwen Plus: 22.0 (#266)

| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1208 | 1326 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 17.8% |
| Omni-MATH | 16.1% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 65.3% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1.7% |

## Knowledge

- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.2 (#274)
- Qwen Plus: 27.4 (#245)

| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 48.1% |
| MMLU-Pro | 41.4% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 28.7% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1328 |

## Multilingual

- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.0 (#243)
- Qwen Plus: 45.3 (#170)

| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1160 | 1310 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1192 | 1347 |
| LMArena Russian | 1187 | 1323 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1251 |

## Instruction Following

- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.8 (#238)
- Qwen Plus: 69.0 (#176)

| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1186 | 1303 |
| IFEval | 78% | — |

## Long Context

- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#229)
- Qwen Plus: 40.3 (#153)

| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1194 | 1325 |

## Writing & Preference

- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.3 (#231)
- Qwen Plus: 52.4 (#171)

| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1218 | 1326 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1199 | 1293 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1221 | 1336 |
| WildBench | 73.4% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better than Qwen Plus?

Qwen Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct or Qwen Plus better for coding?

Qwen Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.3 versus 34.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct and Qwen Plus share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Plus has 20.