# Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct vs Qwen Max

> Qwen Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.4 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/olmo-2-0325-32b-instruct-vs-qwen-max
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen Max in 6 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen Max leads 30.3 to 19.2.
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 32.2 | 34.4 |
| Rank | 248 | 226 |
| Context | — | 33K |
| Input $/M | — | $1.60 |
| Output $/M | — | $6.40 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.6 (#222)
- Qwen Max: 30.3 (#288)

| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1210 | 1288 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 21.8% |

## Reasoning

- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 22.6 (#174)
- Qwen Max: 24.1 (#154)

| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1208 | 1270 |

## Math

- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 24.8 (#255)
- Qwen Max: 21.0 (#272)

| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1208 | 1275 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 16.1% |
| Omni-MATH | 16.1% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 67.2% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1% |

## Knowledge

- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.2 (#274)
- Qwen Max: 30.3 (#222)

| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 56.1% |
| MMLU-Pro | 41.4% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 28.7% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1248 |

## Multilingual

- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.0 (#243)
- Qwen Max: 42.0 (#197)

| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1160 | 1263 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1192 | 1254 |
| LMArena Russian | 1187 | 1274 |
| LMArena French | — | 1329 |
| LMArena German | — | 1254 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1205 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1141 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1290 |

## Instruction Following

- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.8 (#238)
- Qwen Max: 66.7 (#203)

| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1186 | 1262 |
| IFEval | 78% | — |

## Long Context

- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#229)
- Qwen Max: 39.4 (#175)

| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1194 | 1289 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 66.7% |

## Writing & Preference

- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.3 (#231)
- Qwen Max: 48.0 (#200)

| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1218 | 1282 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1199 | 1248 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1221 | 1277 |
| WildBench | 73.4% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better than Qwen Max?

Qwen Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.4 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct or Qwen Max better for coding?

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.6 versus 30.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct and Qwen Max share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Max has 23.