# Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct vs phi-3-medium 14B

> Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.2 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/olmo-2-0325-32b-instruct-vs-phi-3-medium-14b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads 19.2 to 9.1.

## Snapshot

| | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 32.2 | 29.1 |
| Rank | 248 | 306 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.6 (#222)
- phi-3-medium 14B: 36.3 (#198)

| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 37.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1210 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 48.7% |

## Reasoning

- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 22.6 (#174)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1208 | — |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 55.8% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 81.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 121.18 |
| HellaSwag | — | 82.4% |
| WinoGrande | — | 81.5% |

## Math

- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 24.8 (#255)
- phi-3-medium 14B: 25.2 (#249)

| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | 16.1% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1208 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 17.6% |

## Knowledge

- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.2 (#274)
- phi-3-medium 14B: 9.1 (#301)

| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 27.6% |
| MMLU-Pro | 41.4% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 28.7% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 91.6% |
| MMLU | — | 78% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 87.4% |
| TriviaQA | — | 73.9% |

## Multilingual

- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.0 (#243)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1160 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1192 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1187 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.8 (#238)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 78% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1186 | — |

## Long Context

- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#229)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1194 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.3 (#231)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1218 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1199 | — |
| WildBench | 73.4% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1221 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better than phi-3-medium 14B?

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.2 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct or phi-3-medium 14B better for coding?

phi-3-medium 14B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.3 versus 34.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct and phi-3-medium 14B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16 scored results on Noometry and phi-3-medium 14B has 13.