# Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct vs Olmo 3.1 32b Think

> Olmo 3.1 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/olmo-2-0325-32b-instruct-vs-olmo-3-1-32b-think
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Think in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads 35.7 to 19.5.

## Snapshot

| | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 32.7 | 37.9 |
| Rank | 254 | 191 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.2 (#227)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 37.7 (#189)

| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1210 | 1291 |

## Reasoning

- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 23.6 (#175)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 25.2 (#150)

| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1208 | 1272 |

## Math

- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 26.8 (#255)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 36.3 (#168)

| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1208 | 1305 |
| Omni-MATH | 16.1% | — |

## Knowledge

- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.5 (#279)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 35.7 (#181)

| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 41.4% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 28.7% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1295 |

## Multilingual

- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.8 (#248)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.1 (#231)

| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1160 | 1209 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1192 | 1242 |
| LMArena Russian | 1187 | 1193 |
| LMArena French | — | 1260 |
| LMArena German | — | 1262 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1289 |

## Instruction Following

- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.5 (#244)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 65.6 (#218)

| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1186 | 1247 |
| IFEval | 78% | — |

## Long Context

- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#234)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.6 (#195)

| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1194 | 1272 |

## Writing & Preference

- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.1 (#236)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 46.2 (#220)

| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1218 | 1272 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1199 | 1226 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1221 | 1252 |
| WildBench | 73.4% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better than Olmo 3.1 32b Think?

Olmo 3.1 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct or Olmo 3.1 32b Think better for coding?

Olmo 3.1 32b Think scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.7 versus 35.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct and Olmo 3.1 32b Think share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Think has 15.