# o4-mini vs phi-3-medium 14B

> o4-mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.6 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/o4-mini-vs-phi-3-medium-14b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 3

## Summary

- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. o4-mini scores higher in 3 categories and phi-3-medium 14B in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where o4-mini leads 43.5 to 9.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 97.8% for o4-mini and 17.6% for phi-3-medium 14B.
- phi-3-medium 14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | o4-mini | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 41.6 | 29.1 |
| Rank | 119 | 306 |
| Context | 200K | — |
| Input $/M | $1.10 | — |
| Output $/M | $4.40 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- o4-mini: 41.6 (#110)
- phi-3-medium 14B: 36.3 (#198)

| Benchmark | o4-mini | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 45% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 72% | — |
| GSO | 3.6% | — |
| WeirdML | 52.6% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 37.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1369 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 48.7% |
| CadEval | 62% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 826.17 | — |
| AlgoTune | 1.72 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- o4-mini: 32.3 (#57)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | o4-mini | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 53.2% | — |
| GDPval | 25.3% | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 63.9% | — |

## Reasoning

- o4-mini: 24.6 (#143)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | o4-mini | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 145.63 | 121.18 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 6.1% | — |
| SimpleBench | 38.7% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 67.6% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 58.7% | — |
| CritPt | 0.6% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 26% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 9.2% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1351 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 5% | — |
| DTBench | 77.6% | — |
| LMCA | 26.5% | — |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 55.8% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 81.4% |
| ForecastBench | 61.8 | — |
| HellaSwag | — | 82.4% |
| WinoGrande | — | 81.5% |

## Math

- o4-mini: 40.2 (#79)
- phi-3-medium 14B: 25.2 (#249)

| Benchmark | o4-mini | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| MATH Level 5 | 97.8% | 17.6% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 36.1% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 4.9% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 81.7% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 72% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1390 | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 24.8% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 6.3% | — |

## Knowledge

- o4-mini: 43.5 (#83)
- phi-3-medium 14B: 9.1 (#301)

| Benchmark | o4-mini | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 79.6% | 27.6% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 18.1% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 19.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 82% | — |
| Confabulations | 15.8% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 18.6% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 73.5% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1344 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 91.6% |
| MMLU | — | 78% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 87.4% |
| TriviaQA | — | 73.9% |

## Multimodal

- o4-mini: 39.5 (#46)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | o4-mini | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1194 | — |
| GeoBench | 64% | — |
| VPCT | 57.5% | — |

## Multilingual

- o4-mini: 47.2 (#149)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | o4-mini | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1336 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1355 | — |
| LMArena French | 1362 | — |
| LMArena German | 1336 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1308 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1313 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1334 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1346 | — |

## Instruction Following

- o4-mini: 75.4 (#63)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | o4-mini | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 92.8% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1321 | — |

## Long Context

- o4-mini: 45.5 (#31)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | o4-mini | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 77.8% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1315 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- o4-mini: 54.2 (#148)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | o4-mini | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1353 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1294 | — |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 75% | — |
| WildBench | 85.4% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1350 | — |

## FAQ

### Is o4-mini better than phi-3-medium 14B?

o4-mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.6 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is o4-mini or phi-3-medium 14B better for coding?

o4-mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.6 versus 36.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do o4-mini and phi-3-medium 14B share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. o4-mini has 60 scored results on Noometry and phi-3-medium 14B has 13.