# o3-pro vs Qwen3 Coder Next

> o3-pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 34.3 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3 Coder Next costs 121× less per token, which makes it the better buy when o3-pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/o3-pro-vs-qwen3-coder-next
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. o3-pro scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen3 Coder Next in 0 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where o3-pro leads 55.5 to 36.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is WeirdML: 58.2% for o3-pro and 34.4% for Qwen3 Coder Next.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is cheaper at $0.12 / $0.80 per million input/output tokens, against $20 / $80 for o3-pro.
- Qwen3 Coder Next accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 200K.
- Qwen3 Coder Next has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | o3-pro | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 42.9 | 34.3 |
| Rank | 105 | 232 |
| Context | 200K | 262K |
| Input $/M | $20 | $0.12 |
| Output $/M | $80 | $0.80 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- o3-pro: 55.5 (#24)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: 36.3 (#210)

| Benchmark | o3-pro | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 58.2% | 34.4% |
| Aider Polyglot | 84.9% | — |
| SciCode | — | 32.3% |

## Reasoning

- o3-pro: 23.8 (#171)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: 22.4 (#196)

| Benchmark | o3-pro | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 4.9% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 72.1% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 59.3% | — |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| DTBench | 86.9% | — |
| LMCA | 38.5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 147.42 | — |

## Knowledge

- o3-pro: 29.5 (#238)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | o3-pro | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| Confabulations | 14.2% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 23.3% | — |

## Long Context

- o3-pro: 72.2 (#1)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | o3-pro | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 97.2% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- o3-pro: 57.1 (#133)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | o3-pro | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 84.4% | — |

## FAQ

### Is o3-pro better than Qwen3 Coder Next?

o3-pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 34.3 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3 Coder Next costs 121× less per token, which makes it the better buy when o3-pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, o3-pro or Qwen3 Coder Next?

Qwen3 Coder Next is cheaper. It lists at $0.12 per million input tokens and $0.80 per million output tokens; o3-pro lists at $20 and $80.

### Is o3-pro or Qwen3 Coder Next better for coding?

o3-pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 36.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3 Coder Next does, with 262K tokens against 200K.

### How many benchmarks do o3-pro and Qwen3 Coder Next share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. o3-pro has 12 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Coder Next has 3.