# o3-pro vs Qwen1.5-7B

> o3-pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/o3-pro-vs-qwen1-5-7b
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in long context, where o3-pro leads 72.2 to 33.1.
- Qwen1.5-7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | o3-pro | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 42.9 | 31.4 |
| Rank | 105 | 273 |
| Context | 200K | — |
| Input $/M | $20 | — |
| Output $/M | $80 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- o3-pro: 55.5 (#24)
- Qwen1.5-7B: 32.2 (#276)

| Benchmark | o3-pro | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 84.9% | — |
| WeirdML | 58.2% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1107 |

## Reasoning

- o3-pro: 23.8 (#171)
- Qwen1.5-7B: 20.4 (#240)

| Benchmark | o3-pro | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 4.9% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 72.1% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 59.3% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1065 |
| DTBench | 86.9% | — |
| LMCA | 38.5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 147.42 | — |

## Math

- o3-pro: —
- Qwen1.5-7B: 31.4 (#224)

| Benchmark | o3-pro | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1080 |

## Knowledge

- o3-pro: 29.5 (#238)
- Qwen1.5-7B: 28.7 (#243)

| Benchmark | o3-pro | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| Confabulations | 14.2% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 23.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1055 |
| MMLU | — | 62.6% |

## Multilingual

- o3-pro: —
- Qwen1.5-7B: 28.5 (#271)

| Benchmark | o3-pro | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1058 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1141 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1006 |

## Instruction Following

- o3-pro: —
- Qwen1.5-7B: 54.1 (#281)

| Benchmark | o3-pro | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1058 |

## Long Context

- o3-pro: 72.2 (#1)
- Qwen1.5-7B: 33.1 (#266)

| Benchmark | o3-pro | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 97.2% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1090 |

## Writing & Preference

- o3-pro: 57.1 (#133)
- Qwen1.5-7B: 29.6 (#293)

| Benchmark | o3-pro | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1083 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1035 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 84.4% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1062 |

## FAQ

### Is o3-pro better than Qwen1.5-7B?

o3-pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is o3-pro or Qwen1.5-7B better for coding?

o3-pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 32.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do o3-pro and Qwen1.5-7B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. o3-pro has 12 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-7B has 13.