# o3-mini vs Ring-2.6-1T

> o3-mini has enough public results to be ranked (#212); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/o3-mini-vs-ring-2-6-1t
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 2

## Summary

- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. o3-mini scores higher in 1 category and Ring-2.6-1T in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Ring-2.6-1T leads 26.1 to 16.3.
- Ring-2.6-1T has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | o3-mini | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Ant Group (inclusionAI) |
| Noometry Index | 36.7 | 36.9 |
| Rank | 212 | — |
| Context | 200K | — |
| Input $/M | $1.10 | — |
| Output $/M | $4.40 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- o3-mini: 40.8 (#132)
- Ring-2.6-1T: 40.7

| Benchmark | o3-mini | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 39.8% | 42.4% |
| Aider Polyglot | 60.4% | — |
| GSO | 1.3% | — |
| WeirdML | 43.7% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 82.7% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1378 | — |
| CadEval | 54% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 432.57 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- o3-mini: 29.6 (#84)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | o3-mini | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | 22.5% | — |

## Reasoning

- o3-mini: 16.3 (#305)
- Ring-2.6-1T: 26.1

| Benchmark | o3-mini | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0.3% | 3.7% |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 22.8% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 34.5% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 17% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 89.6% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1366 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 7% | — |
| DTBench | 68.8% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 70.6% | — |
| LMCA | 19% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 140.34 | — |
| ForecastBench | 59.6 | — |
| LiveBench | 75.9% | — |

## Math

- o3-mini: 28.1 (#244)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | o3-mini | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 18.6% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 0% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 76.9% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 77.3% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1396 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 96.5% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 12.4% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 4.2% | — |

## Knowledge

- o3-mini: 38.3 (#146)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | o3-mini | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 77% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 15.3% | — |
| Confabulations | 17.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1364 | — |

## Multilingual

- o3-mini: 45.7 (#164)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | o3-mini | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1319 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1379 | — |
| LMArena French | 1334 | — |
| LMArena German | 1303 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1286 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1314 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1304 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1321 | — |

## Instruction Following

- o3-mini: 75.1 (#72)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | o3-mini | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 84.4% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1337 | — |

## Long Context

- o3-mini: 33.8 (#256)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | o3-mini | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 50% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1343 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- o3-mini: 50.3 (#182)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | o3-mini | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1337 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1286 | — |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 61.7% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1320 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 50.7% | — |

## FAQ

### Is o3-mini better than Ring-2.6-1T?

o3-mini has enough public results to be ranked (#212); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

### Is o3-mini or Ring-2.6-1T better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (40.8 vs 40.7); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### How many benchmarks do o3-mini and Ring-2.6-1T share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. o3-mini has 51 scored results on Noometry and Ring-2.6-1T has 3.