# o1 vs Pixtral Large

> o1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.6 to 31.7 on the Noometry Index. Pixtral Large costs 8.8× less per token, which makes it the better buy when o1's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/o1-vs-pixtral-large
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 2

## Summary

- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. o1 scores higher in 3 categories and Pixtral Large in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where o1 leads 55.8 to 32.9.
- Pixtral Large is cheaper at $2 / $6 per million input/output tokens, against $15 / $60 for o1.
- o1 accepts more context: 200K tokens versus 128K.
- Pixtral Large has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | o1 | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 40.6 | 31.7 |
| Rank | 140 | 257 |
| Context | 200K | 128K |
| Input $/M | $15 | $2 |
| Output $/M | $60 | $6 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- o1: 45.7 (#64)
- Pixtral Large: —

| Benchmark | o1 | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 61.7% | — |
| WeirdML | 47.6% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 69.7% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1367 | — |
| CadEval | 56% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 89% | — |
| MBPP+ | 80.2% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- o1: 24.3 (#111)
- Pixtral Large: —

| Benchmark | o1 | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | 10% | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 51.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- o1: 27.5 (#103)
- Pixtral Large: 20.9 (#208)

| Benchmark | o1 | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | 5.7% | 0.8% |
| SimpleBench | 41.7% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 30.7% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 15% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 91.6% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1372 | — |
| DTBench | 74.7% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 65.5% | — |
| LMCA | 22.3% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 141.92 | — |
| LiveBench | 75.7% | — |

## Math

- o1: 34.9 (#150)
- Pixtral Large: —

| Benchmark | o1 | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 14.7% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 73.3% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 80.3% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1388 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 94.7% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 9.3% | — |

## Knowledge

- o1: 41.5 (#101)
- Pixtral Large: —

| Benchmark | o1 | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 76.8% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 8% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 41.1% | — |
| Confabulations | 11.7% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1362 | — |

## Multimodal

- o1: 33.6 (#87)
- Pixtral Large: 30.0 (#105)

| Benchmark | o1 | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1168 | 1089 |
| GeoBench | 80% | — |
| VPCT | 37% | — |
| SpatialViz-Bench | 41.4% | — |

## Multilingual

- o1: 48.8 (#137)
- Pixtral Large: —

| Benchmark | o1 | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1359 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1394 | — |
| LMArena French | 1343 | — |
| LMArena German | 1337 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1346 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1396 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1356 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1345 | — |

## Instruction Following

- o1: 75.0 (#82)
- Pixtral Large: —

| Benchmark | o1 | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 81.5% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1368 | — |

## Long Context

- o1: 50.3 (#9)
- Pixtral Large: —

| Benchmark | o1 | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 83.3% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1378 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- o1: 55.8 (#139)
- Pixtral Large: 32.9 (#273)

| Benchmark | o1 | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1366 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1347 | — |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 70.2% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 988 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1368 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 65.4% | — |

## FAQ

### Is o1 better than Pixtral Large?

o1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.6 to 31.7 on the Noometry Index. Pixtral Large costs 8.8× less per token, which makes it the better buy when o1's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, o1 or Pixtral Large?

Pixtral Large is cheaper. It lists at $2 per million input tokens and $6 per million output tokens; o1 lists at $15 and $60.

### Which has the bigger context window?

o1 does, with 200K tokens against 128K.

### How many benchmarks do o1 and Pixtral Large share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. o1 has 52 scored results on Noometry and Pixtral Large has 3.