# o1-pro vs Qwen2-72B

> o1-pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.5 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/o1-pro-vs-qwen2-72b
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in knowledge, where o1-pro leads 29.7 to 21.2.
- Qwen2-72B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | o1-pro | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 31.5 | 30.0 |
| Rank | 271 | 300 |
| Context | 200K | — |
| Input $/M | $150 | — |
| Output $/M | $600 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- o1-pro: —
- Qwen2-72B: 29.1 (#310)

| Benchmark | o1-pro | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | — | 11.3% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 38.5% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1196 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 54% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- o1-pro: —
- Qwen2-72B: 17.0 (#146)

| Benchmark | o1-pro | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | — | 1.1% |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 29.9% |

## Reasoning

- o1-pro: 20.4 (#239)
- Qwen2-72B: 23.2 (#181)

| Benchmark | o1-pro | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-1 | 23.3% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 6.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1191 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 125.28 |

## Math

- o1-pro: —
- Qwen2-72B: 30.2 (#236)

| Benchmark | o1-pro | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1235 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 39.1% |

## Knowledge

- o1-pro: 29.7 (#234)
- Qwen2-72B: 21.2 (#275)

| Benchmark | o1-pro | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 40.8% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 8.1% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1171 |
| MMLU | — | 82.4% |

## Multilingual

- o1-pro: —
- Qwen2-72B: 35.9 (#244)

| Benchmark | o1-pro | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1176 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1240 |
| LMArena French | — | 1170 |
| LMArena German | — | 1151 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1111 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1083 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1169 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1169 |

## Instruction Following

- o1-pro: —
- Qwen2-72B: 61.7 (#241)

| Benchmark | o1-pro | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1181 |

## Long Context

- o1-pro: —
- Qwen2-72B: 36.1 (#235)

| Benchmark | o1-pro | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1192 |

## Writing & Preference

- o1-pro: —
- Qwen2-72B: 40.8 (#241)

| Benchmark | o1-pro | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1203 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1181 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1196 |

## FAQ

### Is o1-pro better than Qwen2-72B?

o1-pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.5 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do o1-pro and Qwen2-72B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. o1-pro has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2-72B has 26.