# o1-pro vs Qwen1.5-32B

> o1-pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.2 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/o1-pro-vs-qwen1-5-32b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in knowledge, where o1-pro leads 29.3 to 13.5.
- Qwen1.5-32B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | o1-pro | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 31.2 | 30.0 |
| Rank | 264 | 288 |
| Context | 200K | — |
| Input $/M | $150 | — |
| Output $/M | $600 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- o1-pro: —
- Qwen1.5-32B: 31.1 (#278)

| Benchmark | o1-pro | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 32.3% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1155 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 42% |

## Reasoning

- o1-pro: 20.2 (#223)
- Qwen1.5-32B: 20.9 (#210)

| Benchmark | o1-pro | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-1 | 23.3% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 6.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1131 |

## Math

- o1-pro: —
- Qwen1.5-32B: 30.5 (#207)

| Benchmark | o1-pro | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1155 |

## Knowledge

- o1-pro: 29.3 (#227)
- Qwen1.5-32B: 13.5 (#291)

| Benchmark | o1-pro | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 30.7% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 8.1% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1126 |
| MMLU | — | 74.4% |

## Multilingual

- o1-pro: —
- Qwen1.5-32B: 31.6 (#254)

| Benchmark | o1-pro | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1106 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1176 |
| LMArena French | — | 1100 |
| LMArena German | — | 1058 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1027 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1007 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1073 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1089 |

## Instruction Following

- o1-pro: —
- Qwen1.5-32B: 58.0 (#260)

| Benchmark | o1-pro | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1116 |

## Long Context

- o1-pro: —
- Qwen1.5-32B: 34.7 (#241)

| Benchmark | o1-pro | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1146 |

## Writing & Preference

- o1-pro: —
- Qwen1.5-32B: 34.4 (#266)

| Benchmark | o1-pro | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1137 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1083 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1140 |

## FAQ

### Is o1-pro better than Qwen1.5-32B?

o1-pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.2 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do o1-pro and Qwen1.5-32B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. o1-pro has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-32B has 21.