# o1-pro vs Qwen Max

> Qwen Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.7 to 31.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/o1-pro-vs-qwen-max
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen Max leads 25.1 to 20.4.
- Qwen Max is cheaper at $1.60 / $6.40 per million input/output tokens, against $150 / $600 for o1-pro.
- o1-pro accepts more context: 200K tokens versus 33K.

## Snapshot

| | o1-pro | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 31.5 | 34.7 |
| Rank | 271 | 230 |
| Context | 200K | 33K |
| Input $/M | $150 | $1.60 |
| Output $/M | $600 | $6.40 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- o1-pro: —
- Qwen Max: 30.7 (#292)

| Benchmark | o1-pro | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | — | 21.8% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1288 |

## Reasoning

- o1-pro: 20.4 (#239)
- Qwen Max: 25.1 (#151)

| Benchmark | o1-pro | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-1 | 23.3% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 6.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1269 |

## Math

- o1-pro: —
- Qwen Max: 22.3 (#276)

| Benchmark | o1-pro | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 16.1% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1275 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 67.2% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1% |

## Knowledge

- o1-pro: 29.7 (#234)
- Qwen Max: 30.3 (#228)

| Benchmark | o1-pro | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 56.1% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 8.1% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1248 |

## Multilingual

- o1-pro: —
- Qwen Max: 41.8 (#202)

| Benchmark | o1-pro | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1263 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1254 |
| LMArena French | — | 1330 |
| LMArena German | — | 1254 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1205 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1142 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1274 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1290 |

## Instruction Following

- o1-pro: —
- Qwen Max: 66.5 (#208)

| Benchmark | o1-pro | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1262 |

## Long Context

- o1-pro: —
- Qwen Max: 39.4 (#180)

| Benchmark | o1-pro | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 66.7% |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1288 |

## Writing & Preference

- o1-pro: —
- Qwen Max: 47.8 (#205)

| Benchmark | o1-pro | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1282 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1248 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1277 |

## FAQ

### Is o1-pro better than Qwen Max?

Qwen Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.7 to 31.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, o1-pro or Qwen Max?

Qwen Max is cheaper. It lists at $1.60 per million input tokens and $6.40 per million output tokens; o1-pro lists at $150 and $600.

### Which has the bigger context window?

o1-pro does, with 200K tokens against 33K.

### How many benchmarks do o1-pro and Qwen Max share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. o1-pro has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Max has 23.