# o1-mini vs Qwen2.5-Coder-32B

> o1-mini and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (33.7 vs 32.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/o1-mini-vs-qwen2-5-coder-32b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 23

## Summary

- They share 23 benchmarks with published results for both. o1-mini scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where o1-mini leads 35.1 to 22.4.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is LiveBench Reasoning: 72.3% for o1-mini and 42.1% for Qwen2.5-Coder-32B.
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | o1-mini | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 33.7 | 32.9 |
| Rank | 230 | 239 |
| Context | — | 33K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.66 |
| Output $/M | — | $1 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- o1-mini: 35.1 (#218)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 22.4 (#328)

| Benchmark | o1-mini | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 32.9% | 16.4% |
| LiveBench Coding | 48% | 56.9% |
| LMArena Coding | 1362 | 1276 |
| HumanEval+ | 89% | 87.2% |
| MBPP+ | 78.8% | 77% |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 9% |
| WeirdML | 36.3% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 49% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 58% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- o1-mini: 24.3 (#112)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: —

| Benchmark | o1-mini | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | 10% | — |

## Reasoning

- o1-mini: 8.9 (#340)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 20.4 (#220)

| Benchmark | o1-mini | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | 72.3% | 42.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1333 | 1251 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 57.9% | 49.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.82 | 119.41 |
| LiveBench | 57.8% | 46.2% |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0.8% | — |
| SimpleBench | 18.1% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 14% | — |
| HellaSwag | — | 83% |
| WinoGrande | — | 80.8% |

## Math

- o1-mini: 33.7 (#168)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 30.8 (#203)

| Benchmark | o1-mini | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 62% | 46.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1358 | 1251 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 46.9% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 89.2% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1.7% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 93% |

## Knowledge

- o1-mini: 34.8 (#180)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 32.9 (#200)

| Benchmark | o1-mini | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1316 | 1221 |
| GPQA Diamond | 62.4% | — |
| Confabulations | 18.6% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 70.5% |
| MMLU | — | 79.1% |

## Multilingual

- o1-mini: 43.8 (#177)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 38.0 (#230)

| Benchmark | o1-mini | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1289 | 1205 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1314 | 1222 |
| LMArena Russian | 1283 | 1228 |
| LMArena French | 1292 | — |
| LMArena German | 1278 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1245 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1223 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1302 | — |

## Instruction Following

- o1-mini: 67.0 (#200)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 61.6 (#240)

| Benchmark | o1-mini | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 65.4% | 58.7% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1304 | 1223 |

## Long Context

- o1-mini: 40.1 (#156)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 37.9 (#204)

| Benchmark | o1-mini | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1321 | 1251 |

## Writing & Preference

- o1-mini: 48.6 (#196)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 41.8 (#235)

| Benchmark | o1-mini | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1317 | 1230 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1244 | 1174 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1314 | 1222 |
| LiveBench Language | 40.9% | 23.3% |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 64.9% | — |

## FAQ

### Is o1-mini better than Qwen2.5-Coder-32B?

o1-mini and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (33.7 vs 32.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is o1-mini or Qwen2.5-Coder-32B better for coding?

o1-mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.1 versus 22.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do o1-mini and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B share?

23 benchmarks have published results for both models. o1-mini has 39 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B has 31.